2025-yil, 4-son · 30–40-betlar
Особенности и специфика терминологии в международном ядерном праве
Annotatsiya
Atom energetikasining rivojlanishi va tinch yo‘l bilan yadro texnologiyalarining turli sohalarda (energetika, tibbiyot, qishloq xo‘jaligi, sanoat) joriy etilishi xalqaro va milliy jihatlarni qamrab oluvchi aniq va yagona huquqiy tartibga solishga bo‘lgan ehtiyojni kuchaytirmoqda. Bunday tartibga solishning samaradorligining asosiy omillaridan biri xavfsizlik, fuqarolik javobgarligi, litsenziyalash va radioaktiv materiallarni boshqarish masalalarida yagona yondashuvni ta’minlaydigan aniq va kelishilgan terminologiyadir. Ushbu maqola xalqaro yadro huquqidagi terminologiyaning xususiyatlari va o‘ziga xosligini tahlil qilishga qaratilgan bo‘lib, unda milliy va xalqaro huquq normalari o‘rtasidagi muammolar va ziddiyatlar, shuningdek, terminologik tafovutlarning murakkabligini ko‘rsatuvchi misollar ko‘rib chiqiladi. Ishda xalqaro shartnomalar (1963 yilgi Vena konvensiyasi, 1994 yilgi Yadro xavfsizligi to‘g‘risidagi konvensiya va boshqalar), bir qator mamlakatlarning milliy qonunchiligi (AQSh, Rossiya Federatsiyasi, Fransiya) ko‘rib chiqilgan, shuningdek, huquqiy ta’riflar va tartibga solish yondashuvlaridagi mos kelmasliklar bilan bog‘liq asosiy muammoli jihatlar aniqlangan.
Abstract
The development of nuclear energy and the introduction of peaceful nuclear technologies in various fields (energy, medicine, agriculture, industry) increase the need for clear and uniform legal regulation encompassing both international and national aspects. One of the key factors in the effectiveness of such regulation is precise and harmonized terminology, which enables a unified approach to issues of safety, civil liability, licensing, and the management of radioactive materials. This article aims to analyze the features and specifics of terminology in international nuclear law, including an examination of problems and conflicts between national and international legal norms, as well as examples illustrating the complexity of terminological discrepancies. The study reviews international agreements (the 1963 Vienna Convention, the 1994 Convention on Nuclear Safety, among others), national legislation of several countries (the United States, the Russian Federation, France), and identifies the main problematic aspects related to inconsistencies in legal definitions and regulatory approaches.
Iqtibos uchun
Timur Ibadullayev. Особенности и специфика терминологии в международном ядерном праве // Adolat. – 2025. – № 4. – С. 30–40.