2025-yil, 4-son · 65–70-betlar
Huquqiy ong va amaliyot muvozanati: kuch ishlatishda xodim mas’uliyati
Annotatsiya
Ushbu maqolada huquqni muhofaza qiluvchi organlar tomonidan jismoniy kuch, maxsus vositalar va qurol qo‘llash bilan bog‘liq huquqiy masalalar tahlil qilingan. Xususan, xodim harakatining qonuniyligi bo‘lsa-da, uni tushuntirib bera olmaslik holatlari orqali kelib chiqadigan muammolar yoritilgan. Prokuratura organlari tomonidan tushuntirish berolmaslik asosida chiqariladigan xulosalar tanqidiy tahlil qilinadi. Shuningdek, amaliy qaror qabul qilish bilan huquqiy izoh berish o‘rtasidagi farq, xodimlarning kuch ishlatishdan cho‘chishi va buning jamoat xavfsizligiga ta’siri o‘rganilgan. Muammolarni bartaraf etish uchun kasbiy-huquqiy ongni rivojlantirish, huquqiy savodxonlikni oshirish va nazorat organlari bilan samarali hamkorlik qilish bo‘yicha tavsiyalar berilgan.
Abstract
This article provides a legal analysis of issues related to the use of physical force, special means, and firearms by law enforcement officers. Particular attention is paid to situations where the officer’s actions were lawful, but he was unable to explain the legal basis for his conduct, which leads to certain problems. The article offers a critical view of conclusions drawn by prosecutorial authorities based on the officer’s inability to provide legal justification. It also explores the difference between practical decision-making and legal explanation, as well as the tendency of officers to avoid using force due to fear of punishment, and the impact of this on public safety. The article concludes with recommendations for improving professional legal consciousness, enhancing legal literacy, and strengthening cooperation with oversight bodies.
Iqtibos uchun
Abduqodir Abdibositov. Huquqiy ong va amaliyot muvozanati: kuch ishlatishda xodim mas’uliyati // Adolat. – 2025. – № 4. – С. 65–70.