2026-yil, 10-son · 45–54-betlar
Автономность состава легализации преступных доходов по уголовному праву республики Узбекистан
Annotatsiya
Maqolada jinoiy faoliyatdan olingan daromadlarni legallashtirish jinoyati tarkibining avtonomligi muammosi (O‘zbekiston Respublikasi JKning 243-moddasi) tadqiq etiladi. Formal-yuridik, qiyosiy-huquqiy va statistik usullar asosida FATFning 3-tavsiyasi, xalqaro konvensiyalar talablari, Oliy sud Plenumi tushuntirishlari hamda EAGning 2022 yilgi o‘zaro baholash ma’lumotlari tahlil qilingan. Avtonomlikning protsessual, isbotlash va subyekt jihatlari ajratib ko‘rsatilgan. Qonun darajasida o‘z daromadini legallashtirish uchun javobgarlik ta’minlangani, biroq sud amaliyotida legallashtirish uchun ta’qib asosiy jinoyat bo‘yicha qarorga bog‘liq bo‘lib qolayotgani aniqlangan. 243-moddaga izoh kiritish, Plenum qarorining 4-bandini aniqlashtirish va sanksiyani tabaqalashtirish taklif etilgan.
Abstract
The article examines the autonomy of the money laundering offence under Article 243 of the Criminal Code of the Republic of Uzbekistan. Using formal-legal, comparative and statistical methods, the author analyses FATF Recommendation 3, the relevant international conventions, the guidance of the Plenum of the Supreme Court and the data of the 2022 EAG mutual evaluation. Procedural, evidentiary and subject-related dimensions of autonomy are distinguished. The study finds that the law ensures subject-related autonomy (self-laundering is punishable), whereas in judicial practice ML prosecution remains dependent on a decision on the predicate offence. The article proposes an explanatory note to Article 243, an amendment to paragraph 4 of Plenum Resolution No. 1 of 11 February 2011, and a differentiated sanction.
Iqtibos uchun
Naubakhar Uzakbaeva. Автономность состава легализации преступных доходов по уголовному праву республики Узбекистан // Adolat. – 2026. – № 10. – С. 45–54.